Looking for a potential major change in politics in 2024? Consider this unexpected scenario that may bring about such a shift.

Looking for genuine political upheaval? No Labels is eager to provide it. Most Americans are not interested in a repeat of the 2020 election.
Despite everything, Donald Trump and Joe Biden are on track to once again become the Republican and Democratic candidates for the 2024 presidential election.
The organization called No Labels, which presents itself as the representative of the rational majority, has a superior proposal.
They are making efforts to offer what they refer to as a "safety net for 2024".
Their strategy involves securing a place on the ballot in every state across the country and presenting voters with a moderate, nonpartisan group of candidates (such as Joe Manchin and Larry Hogan, or Larry Hogan and Joe Manchin). They are convinced that the moment has arrived for a third political party and an alternative option, and they possess a significant amount of survey data that supports their hypothesis.
Nancy Jacobson, who previously served as the Finance Chair of the DNC, established No Labels in 2010.
The non-profit organization established both the Problem Solvers Caucus in the House, which is composed of members from both political parties, and a similar moderate group in the Senate.
Their objective is to encourage lawmakers to identify shared ground and accomplish tasks.
The Oval Office is now their focus of attention.
The organization "No Labels" is moving forward in their quest to find potential presidential candidates for a third-party ticket, but both conservatives and progressives are unlikely to support this effort.
When asked about the No Labels plan, a political commentator dismissed it by saying that there is nothing in the middle of the road except for dead animals. However, Gallup's recent survey shows that only a small percentage of voters identify as extremely conservative or liberal, so it's unclear why they have such a strong influence. Additionally, more Americans are identifying as independents rather than aligning with the two major political parties. This information may lead to doubts about the effectiveness of the No Labels plan.
The American people have never united in support of a third-party candidate. The few who have managed to gain some popularity have ultimately failed due to the strong loyalty to the two major political parties.
In 2016, the billionaire and former Mayor of New York City, Mike Bloomberg, considered running as a third-party candidate, but was dissuaded by polls indicating that an independent candidate had no chance of winning. A significant portion of registered voters believe this to be true for the United States.
The majority of independents, 65%, and Republicans, 86%, believe that things are going in the wrong direction.
The nation is possibly more dissatisfied than ever before with the expected selection of candidates.
A survey revealed that a majority of registered voters do not want Joe Biden or Trump to run for office. This has caused concern among Democrats as No Labels, a political organization, is gaining more support and needs to raise $70 million to offer voters an alternative option.
This amount of money, which could reach one billion dollars, is not intended for a political campaign. It is estimated to be the expense required to obtain permission to be on the ballot in all 50 states.
It is a difficult task to gather such a large sum of money without having a candidate, a promise to choose one, or a set of principles to follow.
However, they are making significant progress.
A major obstacle was to persuade contributors that their strategy was feasible.
In order to achieve this goal, No Labels carried out an extensive survey across the country in December, which involved over 26,000 individuals who are registered to vote.
According to the survey, Americans across the country are irritable and dissatisfied with their political options.
According to the information, it is possible for a ticket based on common sense to be successful.
What is the reason behind it? Most of the individuals who are registered to vote believe that the United States is...
The majority of independents, 65%, and Republicans, 86%, believe that things are going in the wrong direction.
This was the case not only across the country, but also in each individual state.
It is evident that states that lean towards the Republican party are feeling more disheartened, which is expected since a Democrat, Joe Biden, is currently occupying the Oval Office.
A group is quietly organizing a bipartisan "unity ticket" for the 2024 election as both Biden and Trump approach announcing their campaigns. According to a poll, if the election were held now, it would be a close race with Biden receiving 42% of the vote and Trump receiving 43%.
However, they discovered that a ticket representing the common sense views of the majority would easily defeat both candidates by securing 286 Electoral College votes from states with moderate political leanings. No Labels needs to convince potential donors that their participation in the election would not only disrupt the outcome but also have a chance of winning.
The Republicans may be concerned that a candidate from a third party could reduce Trump's votes and result in Biden winning for another four years, which would be the most unfavorable outcome.
The Democrats may be concerned that a moderate group of candidates could attract support from Biden's voters and ultimately result in Trump being re-elected as President.
The survey conducted in December indicated that both sides would lose votes in almost equal proportions.
To receive the opinion newsletter, click on the provided link. Previously, independent candidates have faced criticism for weakening a candidate who would have otherwise won.
Ross Perot joined the competition against George H.W in 1992.
Bush and Bill Clinton collectively received 19% of the total votes.
The Republicans accused Perot of sabotaging their candidate, but subsequent surveys revealed that the wealthy Texan had actually gained support from both parties. Conversely, it is possible that George W. Bush benefited from Ralph Nader's actions.
In the 2000 election, Bush won due to the fact that the Green Party candidate took away votes from Al Gore's campaign, particularly in the crucial state of Florida.
It is possible to occur.
No Label's program has received other criticisms besides that one.
There are individuals on the conservative side who are wary of the political motives of the leaders of the group and believe that the campaign is a covert assault on Trump.
Some individuals who align with the political Left have made allegations that the group is attempting to sabotage Biden's campaign and assist in the election of Trump.
The group's Founding Chairman is Joe Lieberman, who used to be a senator and is now independent. The former governor of Maryland, who was a Republican, is also involved.
Larry Hogan is the national co-chair.
Both have confirmed their opposition to Trump.
The conservatives mention the connection between No Labels and Mark Penn, a former pollster for Clinton and the spouse of the organization's founder Jacobson. It is believed that No Labels has paid Penn's firm a significant amount for polling and other campaign-related information.
To their commendation, No Labels encounters opposition from both the Left and the Right, as evidenced by the option to obtain the Fox News app by clicking here.
They are collecting funds from both parties.
To achieve their goal of reducing the political divide, they must empower the majority of Americans. This would not just be a political upheaval, but a seismic event.
To access further content from Liz Peek, click on the provided link.