The media is quick to reject the Durham report, which provides more evidence against the widely accepted theory of Russian collusion.

The media is being accused of neglecting their journalistic duties by dismissing the report from Special Counsel John Durham, which contradicts their long-held belief that the Trump campaign colluded with Russia in the 2016 election. Despite the media's insistence on the collusion narrative, Durham's report shows that the Department of Justice and FBI failed to follow the law in their investigation. A journalism professor believes the media's lack of interest in the report is not surprising, as they were so invested in the collusion story that they cannot admit they were wrong.
According to Fox News contributor Joe Concha, it is not surprising that the media is rejecting Durham's report. He believes that this shows that many MSNBC and CNN pundits lack shame. Concha stated that John Durham, who is highly respected in Washington, has concluded that the FBI should not have started the investigation and that the evidence, such as the Steele dossier, was weak from the beginning. He also pointed out that those who previously claimed the Steele dossier was credible are now dismissing Durham's conclusion.
The individuals in question lack a sense of shame and do not adhere to the elevated standards that we anticipate from journalists. It was noted by onlookers that several of the individuals who promoted the Russiagate conspiracy were enthusiastic about minimizing any inquiry into its beginnings.
Andrew McCabe, a CNN contributor and former FBI Deputy Director who was dismissed by then-Attorney General Jeff Sessions in 2018, tried to minimize the significance of Durham's discoveries. He expressed strong disagreement with Mr. Durham's findings.
Durham simplified our actions in the report.
McCabe stated that the individual in question has a significant lack of comprehension regarding both the information available at the time and the process of decision-making. He emphasized that there is no new information and claimed that Durham had no intention of conducting a fair investigation into the anti-Trump Russia probe.
Andrew McCabe, a former FBI official who was fired, has stated that the Durham report is not a genuine investigation and that there is nothing new in it. Joy Reid from MSNBC has asked Peter Strzok, a disgraced ex-FBI agent who was mentioned in the report, to comment on it. Strzok has said that the report's conclusion was predictable and that the investigation should never have happened. Meanwhile, Ben Domenech, a contributor to Fox News, has questioned why McCabe and Strzok are given such influential platforms to express their opinions.
According to Domenech's tweet, it is difficult for any network to hire Andrew McCabe or Peter Strzok after the report.
The enormous pile of falsehoods they have uttered.
CNN has not yet responded to a comment request, which is amazing.
Strzok appears frequently on cable news but is not a paid contributor. McCabe and Strzok were not the only ones who tried to minimize the report; Joe Scarborough from MSNBC referred to it as a disappointment, and Oliver Darcy, a CNN media reporter, described it as a disaster in his passionate newsletter. Darcy wrote that Durham's report failed to meet the exaggerated expectations set by the media that supports Trump, as no one was sent to jail.
After spending millions of dollars on a lengthy investigation, Durham only managed to convict a low-level FBI lawyer who avoided jail time. Andrew Weissmann, a former top prosecutor in the Russia investigation, dismissed the findings as insignificant. Peter Strzok, who was named in the report, believes the investigation should never have taken place. Nicolle Wallace, a strong supporter of the Democratic Party, compared the report to a conspiracy theory during a panel discussion that included former FBI agent Frank Figliuzzi. Wallace suggested that Durham's investigation was influenced by Trump-Barr paranoia and did not yield any guilty convictions related to the questions he was investigating.
This perspective is so deep within the rabbit hole that the focus should be on monitoring Mr.
The report by John Durham, which took four years to complete, was criticized by his former colleague Nora Dannehy and other high-level DOJ prosecutors. Frank Figliuzzi argued that Durham's report was a failure and may have been influenced by an agenda. Despite having worked for Durham in the past, Figliuzzi believes that he twisted himself into a pretzel in an attempt to deliver something he couldn't. CNN legal analyst Jennifer Rodgers dismissed the report as a political opinion piece and suggested that it was a deep state conspiracy theory. Rodgers also pointed out that the FBI's alleged attempt to help Hillary Clinton was unsuccessful since she lost the election. Wallace's comments on the report were made shortly after it was published, indicating that she may have read it quickly or dismissed it without reading the entire document.
The FBI officials who were expected to be imprisoned did not face any legal consequences.
Durham's efforts led to the charging of two individuals.
Both of them were found not guilty during the trial.
This was completely insignificant.
CNN faced backlash from its staff over the Trump town hall event, with some feeling like it was a repeat of the 2016 election. However, the claim of a deep state conspiracy was never proven as it was non-existent. This was stated by Wolf Blitzer during an interview with Rep.
Veronica Escobar, a Democratic representative from Texas, expressed a commonly held belief among left-leaning individuals by stating that the American government has spent a significant amount of money on a report that ultimately did not uncover any wrongdoing. During an interview with Blitzer, Escobar made this point. Meanwhile, political analyst James Carville appeared on MSNBC and disregarded the findings of Durham's report.
Durham can be described as a pitiful individual.
Carville stated that over the course of four years and with the help of his friends, a large sum of money was spent to produce a report that was essentially untrue. McCall criticized MSNBC and CNN for promoting a weak story to further their political agenda, calling it irresponsible journalism. McCall also criticized the media for failing to provide proper context once a more complete counter-narrative was presented by Durham.
The ongoing disregard for the truth shows that numerous media organizations were not focused on reporting factual information, but rather on promoting their own political agendas through biased "journalism" that prioritized advocacy over serving the informational needs of a democratic society. Even though Sussmann was acquitted, the Durham trial added evidence that the Clinton campaign conspired to link Trump to Russia, yet the print outlets that promoted the Russiagate narrative remained silent.
The Durham Report provided limited findings.
One headline from the New York Times declared "The Right Created Its Own," stating that the Republican perspective on the Durham report's conclusion will contribute to a storyline of corrupt "Deep State" activity that is not only supporting Mr.
According to journalist Jonathan Weisman, not only is Trump aiming to become the President again in 2024, but so are many of his competitors for the Republican nomination.
The criticism of the federal bureaucracy was already becoming a prevalent topic in the competition to become the Republican presidential nominee.
Irrespective of the individual named Mr.
Although Durham's report seems to support the idea, it is important to note that Special Counsel Robert Mueller's investigation, which concluded in April 2019, found no proof of criminal collusion or coordination between the Trump campaign and Russia to sway the 2016 election.
The act of unethical journalism was already terrible when it first occurred, but concealing the findings of the Durham investigation implies that a large number of Americans will remain unaware of the unfounded nature of the Russian collusion narrative and the involvement of government officials in its creation. McCall stated that numerous individuals are still misinformed and holding incorrect beliefs about the impact of the Russian collusion hoax on the political environment.
The journalism sector's poor reputation is justified, and neglectful behavior like this only reinforces the public's lack of trust in the industry. Brooke Singman, Jeffrey Clark, David Rutz, and Lindsay Kornick from Fox News collaborated on this article. Click here to download the Fox News app.