The report by Durham is being praised by Trump as a revival of Russia-related issues, but the media is dismissing it as insignificant.

John Durham's investigation, according to one perspective, exonerates Donald Trump and exposes the FBI as a highly prejudiced organization that initiated its Russiagate inquiry on a flimsy pretext.
According to those who disagree, his investigation that lasted for four years was a failure, as stated in an MSNBC headline, because it revealed very little that was not already known and did not result in any arrests.
The situation is similar to a parallel universe where the media debate about Trump and Russia is being repeated. This was triggered when Bill Barr appointed Durham as a special counsel to investigate the investigators in 2019. The media is heavily invested in their own version of the story, to the point where some outlets are simply defending their stance.
The media is facing criticism for their coverage of Governor DeSantis' struggles, and CNN is being criticized for giving a platform to former President Trump. The release of the Durham report is seen as a victory for Trump, as many people are only reading headlines and not delving into the specifics of the Justice Department's actions.
Regardless of the advantages and disadvantages of Bob Mueller's inquiry, he did not discover any proof that the previous president conspired with the Russians.
The New York Times had removed the story from its main page as it seemed to be in a state of defeat. The report by Durham, which was 306 pages long, did not seem to provide any significant new details about the FBI's handling of the Crossfire Hurricane investigation into Russia. It also did not reveal any major revelations that would discredit the bureau, which former President Donald J had hoped for.
Mr. Trump and his supporters had previously implied that Mr.
The Washington Post provided a more impartial view, but acknowledged that the investigation conducted by Durham did not yield significant outcomes in the courtroom.
He accused two individuals of committing crimes, but they were later acquitted. However, a former FBI lawyer admitted to tampering with an email that was used to assist a colleague in obtaining a court order for surveillance of a Trump advisor. Some other news sources have reported similar information, stating that a Senate committee led by Marco Rubio also criticized the FBI's investigation but deemed it necessary. This is referred to as the "DeSantis playbook" for attacking Trump as a false conservative.
The investigation was supported by a significant report from the IG in 2019.
Yesterday, Republican lawmakers and candidates extensively appeared on television and expressed their admiration for Durham while criticizing the FBI.
The Durham submission took us back to a period when lesser-known individuals like Carter Page and George Papadopoulos gained temporary fame, particularly among those who were keeping up with the news.
According to Durham's report, the FBI's investigation relied on unreliable and unverified intelligence, which resulted in significant damage to the bureau's reputation. The report also states that the bureau was unable to confirm any significant claims made in the discredited Steele Dossier, which was compiled by Christopher Steele, a former British spy.
The FBI initiated the Crossfire Hurricane investigation prior to obtaining the document.
According to a statement from the bureau, the actions taken by current FBI leadership were a response to the events that occurred in 2016 and 2017. The report, which at times resembles a typical government audit, criticizes the FBI for its insufficient analytical approach. Trump has referred to the report as the "CRIME OF THE CENTURY," as he had previously anticipated when Durham was appointed.
The Special Counsel John Durham has concluded, after thorough investigation, that the Trump-Russia probe should never have been initiated by the FBI. This implies that the public was deceived. It is acknowledged that there was some partiality at the FBI.
Peter Strzok, who was assigned to lead the investigation, and his girlfriend Lisa Page, who is also an agent, exchanged text messages.
Page expressed doubt about Trump's ability to become president by asking, "He won't become president, will he? Will he?"
I'm sorry, there is no text to paraphrase. Please provide a valid text for me to paraphrase.
Strzok responded by saying that he is not.
"We have been aware of that for years," despite the statement "We'll stop it."
Durham expressed strong disapproval of the FBI's investigation of Hillary Clinton in comparison to their investigation of Trump.
The funding of the Steele Dossier by the Clinton campaign is unacceptable, but this information is not new. Additionally, a report reveals that former CIA Director John Brennan informed President Obama and others about Hillary Clinton's alleged approval of a plan to discredit Donald Trump by accusing Russian security services of interference, but this was already reported in 2020.
I anticipate that the media will lose interest in this matter after a few days, while conservative sources will continue to focus on it for several weeks.
The main point to remember is that Trump is currently the top contender for the Republican nomination. Click the link to access the Fox News app.
Whenever he is questioned about Russia in a debate or any other setting, he will mention that John Durham has completely discredited the investigation, even if the topic is not brought up.
That's the end of the matter for him and his followers.