The White House is furious after a federal judge obstructs the release of migrants who do not have court dates, calling it an act of sabotage.

On Friday, the White House criticized a decision that prevented the government from releasing migrants into the country without court dates, calling it an act of "sabotage." Other government agencies also expressed their disapproval, describing it as "harmful." Regarding the ruling you mentioned, I would like to comment.
During the White House press briefing, Karine Jean-Pierre, the Press Secretary, stated that the evidence clearly indicates that it is an act of sabotage.
Jean-Pierre commented on a recent ruling that granted a two-week restraining order on the "parole with conditions" policy, stating that it was interpreted in a certain way by him and his colleagues.
A federal judge has prevented the Biden administration from releasing migrants without court dates as Title 42 comes to an end. According to a memo from Border Patrol, migrants may be granted parole and allowed into the country if Customs and Border Protection experiences overcrowding, which is usually reserved for urgent humanitarian reasons or significant public benefit.
The memo refers to the process as "parole with conditions," which mandates that migrants schedule a meeting with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) or ask for a Notice to Appear through mail.
The practice of releasing migrants on parole involves their quick release into the country without being assigned an alien registration number or given a court date. This method is allowed when the capacity of a sector exceeds 125%, when 7,000 individuals are apprehended within 72 hours, or when the average time in custody surpasses 60 hours.
The Attorney General of Florida, Ashley Moody, was sued for implementing a policy that was deemed to be very similar to a policy called "Parole + ATD" that was previously blocked by the same judge in March.
The assessment was deemed accurate by Judge Wetherell in his ruling.
The court easily determined that Florida is likely to succeed in their case because the policy in question seems very similar to the Parole+ATD policy that was previously invalidated in Florida. Both policies aim to reduce overcrowding in border patrol facilities and operate by releasing immigrants into the country without issuing a charging document or placing them in immigration proceedings. Instead, they are instructed to report to ICE within a specific timeframe for further processing.
The directive was issued amidst a significant increase in the number of migrants arriving in the United States.
The Title 42 public health order, which permitted the rapid expulsion of migrants because of the COVID-19 outbreak, has lapsed at the border.
On several occasions, agents came across more than 10,000 migrants, and as of Friday morning, there were over 25,000 in custody.
The DHS cautioned that prohibiting the use of parole could lead to disorder at the border and predicted that it would result in detaining 45,000 migrants by May's end. However, the judge did not find these claims convincing.
The chief of the border patrol has allowed migrants to enter the US without court dates as Title 42 comes to an end. The defendants' claims of chaos at the border are not convincing, as President Biden himself has acknowledged the issue has been ongoing for years. The problem is largely due to the defendants' policies that have encouraged irregular migration over the past two years, as explained in Florida.
She stated that the ruling is detrimental and the Department of Justice will oppose it.
Earlier on Friday, a statement made by Customs and Border Protection (CBP) was reiterated in her comments.
The statement expressed concern about the ruling and its potential to cause overcrowding and unsafe conditions at CBP facilities. It also stated that both Republican and Democratic administrations have used parole authority to protect the safety of migrants and Border Patrol agents in the past. The Fox News app can be accessed by clicking on the provided link.
On Friday, a lawsuit led by Texas was filed challenging the same policy as the Florida lawsuit and requested a restraining order. Bill Melugin from Fox News provided additional information for this report.